I am excited to announce that my practice will be moving to Bansley, Anthony, Burdo, LLC in New Haven as of September 17, 2018. There, I will continue to offer clients exceptional representation in criminal cases. Now, we are right in the heart of New Haven! Reach out to me there to discuss representation on your criminal case. I can be reached at 203-776-1900 or firstname.lastname@example.org
This week I will have a THIRD hearing before the criminal court as to whether a protective order should be modified to allow a husband back into his home with his wife and daughter where the wife has written numerous letters to the court and state attorney begging for it to be modified. Why?
When he was arrested for misdemeanor threatening and disorderly conduct, the court issued a full no contact protective order and a condition of his release was to "cooperate with DCF" (it was subsequently modified to a residential stay away). The child was not a "victim" in the case, but she was in the house when the arguing took place. DCF opened an investigation and demanded that he go for substance abuse evaluation and treatment, counseling at a specific treatment facility, sign a case plan and submit to home visits. Client engaged in treatment, but not the specific treatment facility that DCF wanted and so he was deemed non-compliant. Client allegedly refused to sign a case plan so he was deemed non-compliant (despite never having been presented one). Client allegedly refused to allow future home visits, and was deemed non-compliant. Mind you, these are all rights that one has available against DCF; however, when there is a criminal case pending DCF will use the criminal court as a sword to force cooperation. He was found to not be in compliance and so the protective order remained, keeping him out of his home. He was subsequently arrested for violating said protective order for merely being at home with his family.
Client engaged in treatment at the prescribed facility for a period of time but the available time scheduled did not work with his job. They continued to give him treatment slots at 12pm in the afternoon, requiring him to take off 2 hours from work in the middle of the day for the session and travel time. He re-engaged with another provider that worked better for his schedule but DCF claims he is non-compliant with his treatment.
In the interim, DCF files a neglect petition in juvenile court. If the court determines that there is abuse and/or neglect, DCF has requested he continue with his mental health treatment and attend a counseling program called IPV Fair. If, however, the court does not determine there is a basis for the petition, then the court will not order him to do these things. However, despite this, DCF continues to file papers with the criminal court saying that because he has not engaged in those things, he is "non-compliant" and the protective order should, therefore, not be modified.
We have another hearing scheduled this week to ask that the protective order be modified after one year of being order out of his home. Given DCF's position, the criminal court is unlikely to modify if.
So, moral of the story? You have rights to contest DCF's involvement in your life but, apparently, are unable to exercise them.
We have been retained to represent Antonio Torres- Rodriguez against allegations that he sexually assaulted two young girls and then fled to Florida. The case is pending at the Stamford-Norwalk Judicial District in Stamford.
We have been retained to handle the jury trial of Ms. Kirvanna Jones, who was accused of having a sexual relationship with a student in December 2015 while a teacher at ESUMS school in New Haven.
Ms. Jones vigorously denies the allegations and we look forward to the trial.
We have been retained to represent one co-defendant in an alleged conspiracy to kill a body shop owner over a drug debt. We look forward to testing the allegations in court.
This week we were able to obtain a nolle for a client charged with Assault in the second degree in connection with a case caught on video, as seen here:
We were retained to represent Mr. Rivera in this case alleging that drugs and guns were seized from the Howard Johnson Hotel in Milford, CT.